EPP Group leads rejection of flawed deforestation risk list

Led by the EPP Group, a majority in the European Parliament today rejected the European Commission’s proposed classification of deforestation risk countries. The objection reflects serious concerns about outdated data, a lack of transparency, and a flawed benchmarking system that overlooks forest degradation, focusing only on deforestation. 

“Today’s vote is a strong signal that we want practical, fair, and effective forest protection,” said Alexander Bernhuber MEP, who tabled the objection on behalf of the EPP Group.

“The Commission’s list misrepresents the situation in many countries and creates unnecessary burdens for farmers, foresters, and industry. The EPP Group remains committed to responsible forest stewardship and to policies that combine environmental protection with workable solutions for those who care for and rely on forests. Therefore, a new ‘no risk’ category must be introduced for countries with stable or expanding forest areas. This is how we make EU rules more fair and effective.” 

Christine Schneider MEP, the European Parliament's lead negotiator on the anti-deforestation law, added: “We want to stop deforestation effectively, but not by drowning responsible forest managers in bureaucracy. The Commission’s current approach imposes a blanket burden instead of targeting real risk. A more balanced, transparent system will protect forests better and support those who manage them sustainably.” 

Now that the objection has passed, the Commission should withdraw and revise the deforestation risk list. For the EPP Group, it is crucial that this includes the introduction of a 'no risk' category. The EPP Group is committed to protecting forests through smart, science-based policies that use up-to-date data and reflect national realities.